This statement is mainly considering data from the six,141 women in the feminine respondent document of your own 2017–2019 NSFG and you will specialist-vides an upgrade out-of an earlier 2015–2017 NSFG review of current birth prevention reputation (4). S. female old fifteen–44. New fieldwork bundle, interviews swindle-tent, or any other questionnaire measures act like past studies (5). NSFG is as you prepared and you can funded because of the Federal Cardio having Health Analytics (NCHS) and some other programs of You.S. Institution from Health insurance and Individual Qualities. Most of the estimates within report are weighted so you can mirror the feminine home inhabitants aged fifteen–forty-two of your All of us during the midpoint out-of 2017–2019 interviewing ( NSFG was 63.4% overall, 65.2% to possess women respondents, and you can 61.4% getting male respondents.
Analytics for this statement had been put utilising the Questionnaire tips into the SAS app adaptation 9.cuatro. Percent were com-pared playing with a couple of-tailed t evaluation in the 5% top. Zero customizations have been made to possess several reviews. Questionnaire clusters minus strata were used since quantities of freedom getting significance review away from pairwise reviews. A adjusted the very least squares re-gression was applied to check on to possess linear trends across years and you can knowledge making use of the level of classes minus a couple of because de–grees regarding independence. Read More
